Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Halde Haniel Amphitheater 2014.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Halde Haniel Amphitheater 2014.jpg, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2014 at 07:37:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Mining waste tip (Halde Haniel) in Bottrop with Amphitheater (for events)
all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 07:37, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 07:37, 23 August 2014 (UTC)- Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:15, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 14:35, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Caecilius Mauß (talk) 18:09, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:43, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:53, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support --XRay talk 12:30, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Oppose for sure a remarkable place for an amphitheater, but photographical nothing special for me. Above all the background is extremly overexposed/washed out --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:23, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- I like the composition and motive very much, that was the reason for nomination - photographically special enough for me :) But you are wrong with the background - there is nothing overexposed. It was a very foggy (and windy) day thus the landscapes is hidden behind fog. For me the the naturally washed out background is a good contrast to the remarkable mining waste tip. I have also a b/w development of this photo where this contrast is even more accentuated and looks great imho. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:48, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- In this image we have also strongly fog File:Los Angeles Pollution.jpg (even more than in yours) but we have not a washed out impression. I belive that there was fog, but this image is nevertheless not well done. You have made the exposure on the main object and have forgotten the background. --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:58, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Halavar (talk) 22:33, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support Like often quality is here, the value also is here, but the weather make the image very sad. However the main subject occupies almost all of the image and save it from the sad mood. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 16:29, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Chmee2 (talk) 11:49, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 12:43, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico talk 11:40, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Weak Support due to improvable sharpness, lighting and lack of "tension" in the picture. I'd have prefered another POV with a different angle Poco2 17:42, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
