Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vitral em Igreja Santa Efigenia.jpg

File:Vitral em Igreja Santa Efigenia.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2014 at 17:09:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vitral em Igreja Santa Efigenia.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vitral em Igreja Santa Efigenia.jpg

•  Info Stained glass windows of sacred Heart of Jesus Christ in Igreja Santa Efigenia in São Paulo, Brazil. All by myself -- Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 17:09, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 17:09, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support ArionEstar (talk) 19:13, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Dman41689 (talk) 04:21, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. Yann (talk) 04:52, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Mile (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:59, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose The technical quality of this image is excellent, but the artistic quality of this stained glass is not. The face of Christ is absolutely featureless, and it is not attracting me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:21, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Info @Uoaei1 I do not understand the tastes of the artists of Venice, origin of stained glass in this Church in 1910, but it is a relevant Church (here) and very beautiful, and this stained glass and photographic work seem appropriate on a multi cultural work. - I respect your opinion and your work and this is for information only. ; ) -- Lauro Sirgado^contribs 00:25, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Uoaei1: This presumption is relative. The art of the countries and regions should not be compared, you can not compare the pre-Columbian ceramics with Japanese ceramics, and stained glass of "notredame de Paris" with "notredame of Italy". Why ?, the reason is simple, the technique may be higher in other parts of Europe, however, the artistic value is relative and depends on the region and the historical moment in which it was created, however, does not lose value because art can not be compared. --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 11:34, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment You are absolutely right that it is dangerous to compare or rate artistic value, especially for someone who is interested, but not an expert. The technique of the artist is not important for me. My major criterion is: does this inspire me? For me, this stained glass does not (like almost all artworks of this style), as I miss facial expressions or emotions. Or in other words: no wow for me, sorry! But if it inspires you, in an artistic, religious or any other manner, then it does well. --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:43, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
    • Ok, now I underestand you, simply no show for you, ok --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Uoaei1. Excellent quality picture, but no artistic value (for my taste, of course)--Jebulon (talk) 10:09, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above, sorry Jiel (talk) 21:52, 11 September 2014 (UTC).
•  Support Basik07 (talk) 19:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lauro Sirgado^contribs 18:57, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Jee 03:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects