निर्वाचित चित्र उम्मीदवार वो चित्र (छवियाँ) हैं जिनके कॉमन्स पर सर्वोत्तम चित्रों में से एक होने के लिए समुदाय के लोग मतदान करेंगे। यह सूची उन उम्मीदवारों की है जो निर्वाचित चित्र हो सकते हैं। आज का चित्र निर्वाचित्र चित्रों में से चुनी हुई एक छवि होगी।
यदि आपको लगता है कि आपने एक महत्वपूर्ण चित्र प्राप्त अथवा निर्मित किया है जो उपयुक्त चित्र विवरण और मुद्राधिकार के साथ है, तब निम्न कार्य करें।
प्रथम चरण: चित्र का नाम निम्न खाने में उपस्थित पाठ के आगे लिखें, उदाहरण के लिए, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:आपके चित्र का नाम.jpg लिखें और "नया नामांकन आरम्भ करें।" बटन पर क्लिक करें।
सभी एकल फाइलें:
पुनः नामांकन के लिए चित्र के नाम 'के बाद केवल /2 लिखें। जैसे:– Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
Set nominations ONLY
Sets are temporarily disallowed for technical reasons; will reopen soon.
द्वितीय चरण: आप जिस पृष्ठ पर पहुँचे हैं वहाँ के निर्देशों का पालन करें और पृष्ठ को संरक्षित करें।
वो सम्पादक जिनका खाता कम से कम १० दिन पुराना है और ५० सम्पादन कर चुके हैं, अपना मत दे सकते हैं। अपने नामांकन के लिए कोई भी मतदान कर सकता है। अज्ञात (आईपी) मतों की अनुमति नहीं है।
आप निम्न साँचे काम में ले सकते हो:
{{Support}} (Support),
{{Oppose}} (Oppose),
{{Neutral}} (Neutral),
{{Comment}} (Comment),
{{Info}} (Info),
{{Question}} (Question),
{{Request}} (Request).
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.
Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 16:11:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Billie Eilish at Pukkelpop Festival - 18 AUGUST 2019 (01) (cropped).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Billie Eilish at Pukkelpop Festival - 18 AUGUST 2019 (01) (cropped).jpg
Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 16:07:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Aix galericulata (Female), Richmond Park, UK - May 2013.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aix galericulata (Female), Richmond Park, UK - May 2013.jpg
Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 11:03:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Charaxes eudamippus Doubleday, 1843 - Great Nawab 8.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Charaxes eudamippus Doubleday, 1843 - Great Nawab 8.jpg
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 19:19:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Larus occidentalis (Western Gull), Point Lobos, CA, US - May 2013.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Larus occidentalis (Western Gull), Point Lobos, CA, US - May 2013.jpg
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 15:06:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Oxelaëre le porche en2018 l'église Saint-Martin.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oxelaëre le porche en2018 l'église Saint-Martin.jpg
Info Oxelaëre (départment du Nord, France), portal of the St Martin's church decorated with medallions carved with effigies of King David represented with his harp on the left, and Saint Cecilia with a zither on the right all by me -- Pierre André (talk)15:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Northwest view upwards to the pediment, rotunda, and dome of the California State Capitol in Sacramento. I wanted to make the bright dome stand out well against a dark blue sky. The camera location was about 30 meters away from the building. Perspective distortion correction has been applied, more would look unnatural. What do you think, is the chosen gallery Architectural elements#Others appropriate or should Architecture/Exteriors#United States be chosen instead? I was a bit unsure, thanks in advance for your feedback. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect symmetry, interrupted only by the banners proudly fluttering in the breeze, beautiful lateral light which emphasizes the three-dimensionality of the sculptures, great blue/white contrast which is, again, broken only by the banners. As the photo shows big parts of the building, I would favour Architecture/Exteriors#United States. – Aristeas (talk) 07:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A great shot, well done. I'm just wondering, how many photos will you have tried? And..., if I may ask: with a slower exposure, would you have had flags motion and/or a brighter blue sky? I don't want to criticize your work, it's just curiosity. --Terragio67 (talk) 01:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much, Terragio67. My aim was to capture all the details of the white facade's structures in the bright light and contrast them well against a dark blue sky. A narrower aperture and longer exposure resulted in blown highlights and less detail on the white facade. In addition, I didn't have a tripod with me at the time. I took quite a few shots of this detail also at other ISO settings. But there are only three left because I deleted the most useless ones. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 05:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Thousands of gulls come to this beach just after high tide this time of year, just after all the horseshoe crabs have come ashore to lay their eggs. It's a feeding frenzy spectacle. At one point, something spooked them and they took to the air. We were standing out on a mud flat at the time and it sort of felt like they were circling us -- very loud and kind of surreal (and somehow we escaped without getting anything falling on us). This is my effort at capturing the chaotic moment, quickly snapping five frames for a panorama. The vast majority of these birds are laughing gulls (Leucophaeus atricilla), but there are several herring gulls, too, as well as Canada geese and mallards. all by — Rhododendritestalk | 02:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An impressive scene. Reminds me of a famous movie quote: “Have you ever seen so many seagulls? What do you suppose it is?” -- Radomianin (talk) 05:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there are some stitching errors on birds (imo nothing serious). I would be happy to support, if they are addressed. -- Ivar (talk) 19:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to Iifar for spotting the flaws that I also missed, and thanks to Rhododendrites for the fixes that have improved the image. Unfortunately there are blue edge repetitions below the wings in many places. They resemble chromatic aberration, but apparently are not. Maybe you can do something about that. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 05:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Stitching photos is difficult and sometimes (as in this case) painful. So that everyone can appreciate your work, it would be nice to see the 5 individual photos. However, I'm curious to see the corrections you're making. --Terragio67 (talk) 02:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 15:57:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Кронштадт, морской собор сверху зимой.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Кронштадт, морской собор сверху зимой.jpg
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 10:05:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:14 de julio día de despedidas (29969735828).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:14 de julio día de despedidas (29969735828).jpg
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 06:44:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Calidris Alba on one foot at Caspersen Beach.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Calidris Alba on one foot at Caspersen Beach.jpg
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 05:09:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Bloem van een Oenothera stricta 'Sulphurea'. 30-05-2024 (d.j.b.).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bloem van een Oenothera stricta 'Sulphurea'. 30-05-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 09:52:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Un pecheur rentre au port au lever du jour à kerkennah - vue large - tunisie.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Un pecheur rentre au port au lever du jour à kerkennah - vue large - tunisie.jpg
I'm going to, just I'm not at home for the next 4 days, but I'll take care of it as soon as I get back, I promise, thank you for your comment :) Skander zarrad (talk) 14:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Creative composition but the blurry foreground ruins it, sorry. Because it makes the whole image too busy and cluttered. Imagine the picture without these distracting elements, it would be much better. Although the contrejour is average, with lack of detail, poor contrasts, and blown highlights -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive story-telling composition, linking natural objects, playing with the themes of sea, sun and fishing, rationally, consistently, at the same time transcending on several axes, effectively making it three-dimensional. Pleasant light and good technical quality. --Argenberg (talk) 22:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 03:53:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Portale della Chiesa di San Michele.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Portale della Chiesa di San Michele.jpg
Weak oppose While I see this photo as a superior to full scale chapel (if you can't step further from the object — shoot the details), this picture is lacking wow and is blurred on the top. Maybe a QI but not a FP IMO, sorry. Красныйwanna talk?09:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like this composition with the oculus a lot better than the cropped alternative below, but unfortunately the sharpness is lacking as Красный mentioned. dllu(talk)07:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support In macro photography Sebring12Hrs if you don't stack images with different depths of field you can't have all the animal in focus especially if it is not parallel to the lens. The photo was taken at f13, he couldn't do better--El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You don't have as big a depth of field as you do with focus-stacking though this was not taken with a macro lens. The depth of field is worse if you get in too close. Naturally, an animal in profile will have more of its body in focus than this sort of threequarter view, but Orthoptera legs and Tettigoniidae antennae are very tricky. There is seldom a reason to crop off part of an animal unless the objective is a close up. In this case a tighter crop just to show the head would make it look better, but the head isn't especially sharp so it might not be worth it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, yes it is. I've only done test photos using 50mm macro. I had to get too close, so not much good for the insect macros I take. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The animal was cut (leg and antenna), additionally the problem of depth of field, here you can see an image of a similar subject in focus and not cut --Wilfredor (talk) 12:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this makes it easier to solve the depth of field problem but I was referring to the problem of not cutting the animal. Wilfredor (talk) 23:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 11:45:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:004 Sunrise at Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:004 Sunrise at Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
Thank you for your message. The focus was at infinity. The house on the hill for example seems in clear focus to me. Maybe because of the huge resolution of the file it was still rendering when you zoomed in? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very atmospheric. The mountain and also most of the trees on the plain are in focus. I guess the impression of softness is just due to some haze which may be inevitable at these distances. – Aristeas (talk) 06:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info The image quality is significantly worse than existing FP File:Mount Rushmore detail view.jpg. It is only a tenth of the resolution in each dimension not to mention worse dynamic range and detail. (Original nomination)
Keep This wouldn't be promoted now, after someone has uploaded a 600 megapixel behemoth view of the same subject, but on its own it doesn't fall short enough of FPC standards to need delisting. It's not like this is is VIC, where there can only be one image per subject. — Rhododendritestalk | 20:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Even though the pictures portraits the same subject almost from the same placement, light and colors are slightly different. I agree with to others to keep both as FP, too. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Am I crazy? I don't think this is a photograph at all.. Look at how the lines differs in thickness when they're being stretched VS when being compressed... this is just a bunch of lines with a swirl filters on it and blending layers Henrysz (talk) 03:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose technically a good shot, but not outstanding to me. Especially the shadow in the background doesn't help. --MB-one (talk) 11:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 00:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Photograph of Gustave Doré by Nadar, between 1856 and 1858.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Photograph of Gustave Doré by Nadar, between 1856 and 1858.jpg
Question I get that the noise is authentic to the source photograph, but wouldn't it be even better to remove it digitally? --MB-one (talk) 11:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Ecocathedral in Mildam municipality of Heerenveen, Part of surplus building material stacked in a special way. (This is a special project that will continue until the year 3000). All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose interesting subject and technically a good shot. But the composition and contrast is not FP worthy to me. --MB-one (talk) 12:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 19:32:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Arabian shepherd selling sheep in Ramadan month (street of Marrakesh).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Arabian shepherd selling sheep in Ramadan month (street of Marrakesh).jpg
Info Lonely Arabian shepherd selling sheep in Ramadan month (street of Marrakesh, far from souk). My shot. --Mile (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 18:47:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Balzender-Blauer-Pfau-Zoo-Duisburg-2024.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Balzender-Blauer-Pfau-Zoo-Duisburg-2024.jpg
Oppose Sorry, insufficient compositional quality for a common animal. Part of the organism is obscured and the background is busy. dllu(t,c)22:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 18:38:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Zebramanguste-Mungos-Mungo-Zoo-Duisburg-2024.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zebramanguste-Mungos-Mungo-Zoo-Duisburg-2024.jpg
Weak support Correct focus with acceptable DoF, nice composition and the subject is well lit, but I find the bright spot top left a little distracting. BigDom (talk) 02:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not a good file name per Commons guidelines. Please think of such things before you create nominations. Something like "Woman with rainbow-hued body makeup" would be better. Plus the description is inadequate, I'll fix that one for you. --Cart(talk)09:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No urgency per se, but people may be more inclined to support the nom if everything is top notch for it, plus nominators tend to forget such "minor" things once they've got their star. --Cart(talk)18:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This image is technically fine, but I don't like the left-leaning nature of the subject. A centered subject is preferable, and a more expressive face is desirable. Overall, not FP in my eyes. WolverineXI10:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your review, Wolverine XI. As far as I know, this kind of image composition is often used in documentaries to create suspense and attention. The usual harmonious placement on the right would be the less conspicuous standard. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Much better thank you! There seems to still be a blurry area close to her right shoulder (so the shoulder that appears on left on the image). There is also a blurry area close to the thumb and close to the other hand. Also, I'm wondering, is it over a table that she's placing her arms or is just a soft surface? Because it is a bit strange how the sort of white table is extremely linear just bellow the body but on the left it becomes a bit wavy (so I think it's a soft surface but that there was a white rectangle applied in postproduction bellow the body) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the quick feedback, Giles. The messy spot on her right shoulder has been fixed and the link above has been updated with the 2nd edit. As for the table, I think it's either a soft blanket or a mattress that the model is resting her elbows on. The area in the middle at chest height was probably straightened afterwards by the creator. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for the update, Yann. Sorry I wasn't that fast :) Updated the link above: I removed the messy spot on the right shoulder that Giles mentioned. I'll leave it up to you if you want to do another update. If so, thanks in advance :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Yann, unfortunately in my haste I forgot to edit two spots mentioned by Giles, namely those on the right thumb and the left hand. I apologize that you have to take action again, but you can wait until tomorrow after Giles has checked again. I think all the spots are fixed now. The link above has been updated. It's the best we can do to rescue the nomination :) Sincerely, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you and very good job Radomianin! I support the third edited version with the hands blur fixed that I guess will be uploaded soon to update the actual version Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 14:14:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Escalators at the train station in Helsinki airport.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Escalators at the train station in Helsinki airport.jpg
The ceiling (ceiling/teto is what you see inside a building, and a roof/telhado is what you see from the outside) is not horizontal, it is leaning and it is higher on the right side than the left side. There is nothing the photographer can do about it; unless he brings in a building team and have them reconstructing the station. --Cart(talk)15:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ermell: Don't want to remove the entrance because it would kill the symmetry of the upper part, but I managed to reduced the moiré at least. --Plozessor (talk) 05:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question There seem to be quite a few problems with the detail; naturally maps are all about accurate detail. It needs consistency of use of Norwegian/English (e.g. Gata/Gate; use of Ceramist (a person) as opposed to Ceramics/Pottery). Accommodation should be Hotel. Huset Vart seems to be a shopping centre in a converted bicycle factory, not a science factory. Do Norwegians translate Vinmonopolet as Liquor Store; the American term? I've heard them using alcohol store or using vinmonopolet when speaking English. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note from a Scandi. These days the languages (Norwegian/Swedish/Danish) spoken and written by Scandinavians contain a lot of English words and expressions, and most of us don't know the difference between pure American and British English. We learn and use a hodgepodge from what we pick up in media, films and tv shows, and try to adapt what we say so that people will understand the meaning rather than true translations. It's sort of the Scandi version of Pidgin English. Hence we use the real names of companies like 'Vinmonopolet' (in Sweden, Systembolaget has the same function) when speaking among foreign friends, but terms like 'Liquor Store' when describing it to the public in general. --Cart(talk)11:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever it should be called, the Vinmonopolet is nowhere near the shown location from 2022, so you'd never find it using this map. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Leaning keep, but a few comments/questions: 1) why not go with the svg version? 2) It looks like File:City map stavanger.svg is the user's masterwork (in its 24th edition!). 3) Since it looks like the creator regularly updates these, does promoting it to FP prevent that updating? Would it have to be a separate file? I would support a rare exception to the prohibition on changing FPs once they're promoted in a case like this, since updates are likely just going to make it more accurate (and remove mistakes/out of date locations). — Rhododendritestalk | 17:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Could you please add a description in English (even with Google Translate, native speakers will fix it if needed). Yann (talk) 14:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can only see slight grain when pixel peeping the 100 megapixel image, which I don't find distracting at all. Are you perhaps referring to the ripples reflecting the sky? dllu(t,c)05:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but per the header, only "[e]ditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." Your account only has 24 edits as of 09:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC). --SHB2000 (talk) 09:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty uninteresting light and strangely washed out colours on the building. The sharpness could also be better.--Ermell (talk) 13:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree about the light. Regrettably, the sky was hazy. The colors are slightly washed out since it's very far away, but I've already applied aggressive dehazing compared to the original [1]. I'm surprised to see sharpness being mentioned since the sharpness seems fine to me on the 100 megapixel photo except perhaps for the extreme corners of the image. dllu(t,c)20:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 19:59:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Grèbe castagneux Lac de Tunis.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grèbe castagneux Lac de Tunis.jpg
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 18:32:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Weg auf der Ostseite des Galgenfeldsees bei Haßfurt.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Weg auf der Ostseite des Galgenfeldsees bei Haßfurt.jpg
Support Beautiful autumn scenery. It could be worth trying to brighten up it further – underexposing was necessary here, but is to be compensated in post-processing. Of course it’s a matter of taste how bright it should get … – Aristeas (talk) 07:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 17:39:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Cuernos del Paine in Torres del Paine National Park.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cuernos del Paine in Torres del Paine National Park.jpg
Oppose The cloud obscuring parts of the mountain isn't visually appealing IMO. Also, the quality of the mountains isn't worthy of a FP, especially when the resolution and size are near 20 MB -- WildMouse76 (talk)20:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the scene. It's true that the quality of the mountains could be better, but there are many details in the foreground. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 15:21:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (13).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (13).jpg