Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 18 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Saint_Segolene_church_in_Soual_(12).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Saint Segolene church in Soual (by Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 15:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough. Why is this image presented for QI? -- Spurzem 19:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC) I did not see the whole size. Please exuse me. -- Spurzem 18:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
  • It is absolutely very sharp. I don't understand your vote, is it a mistake ? --Sebring12Hrs 20:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Must be. To me this is very much sharp. --Nacaru 00:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support I honestly don't understand why this picture is here.--GoldenArtists (talk) 15:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharpness is fine, the picture is good. --Syrio 15:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Probably a slow upload --Moroder 09:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 18:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 01:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Rippel_im_Sand_am_Strand_Norderneys_03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination ripple marks at the beach of Norderney --Stephan Sprinz 19:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 20:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose oversharpened, sorry --Nikride 09:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support I love the pattern. -- Marnanel 16:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 01:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Paysage_de_fin_de_journée_à_la_Galite.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Paysage de fin de journée à la Galite.jpg --Atef Ouni 11:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 01:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose noisy sky, sorry --Nikride 09:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree with Nikride. I'm sorry. --Nacaru 00:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Promising in the preview, technically disappointing in full resolution. --Milseburg (talk) 15:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 05:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Cáceres_-_Towers_of_San_Francisco_Javier.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Cáceres (Extremadura, Spain) - Towers of St. Francis Xavier church, viewed from Plaza Santa Maria --Benjism89 11:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Colors look unnatural, can you correct it, Benjism89? --Nacaru 00:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
  • @Nacaru: Not sure which way you would like colors corrected, white balance seems OK to me. Do you feel it's oversaturated ? This picture was taken in the morning, maybe an hour after sunrise, hence the light. Benji 05:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support The color looks good to me. --Syrio 15:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Colors are looking fine. Composition is probably unusual but I like it. --Plozessor 14:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 01:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Orchis_mâle,_montagne_de_la_Motte,_Champsaur,_France_03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Early Purple Orchid (Orchis mascula), Champsaur, France. --Yann 18:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support A bit noisy, otherwise good --MB-one 20:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --C messier 20:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too much noisy, please discuss. --Sebring12Hrs 11:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support per MB-one. Good enough for an A4-size print. --Smial 11:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 13:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Знаменка._Дворец._детали_02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Double-headed eagle of Russia on the top of Znamenka palace. Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 05:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Out of focus --Romainbehar 06:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support. Sharp enough. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 14:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not very sharp, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 11:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support per Spurzem. Somewhat tight crop, and somewhat noisy, but good enough for an A4-size print. --Smial 11:33, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose noisy --Nikride 13:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support can't agree with opposers. Noise and unsharpness starts only if you zoom image so hard, so upper crown would fill all the screen. That's borderline but ok for me. Красный 22:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Some noise and processing artifacts at full resolution, but that is high and it looks perfectly fine at lower, still adequate, resolution. --Plozessor 04:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality - "sharpness" is relative to magnification and unless this building detail is blown out of proportion it appears to meet acceptable standards for QI. --Scotch Mist 06:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Looking at the eagle heads, this photo looks overprocessed to me.--Peulle 10:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 05:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Знаменка._Дворец._детали_03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Exterior detail of Palace of Grand Duke Nikolai Nikolaevich. Znamenka estate, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 05:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Out of focus --Romainbehar 06:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support. Sharp enough. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 14:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not very sharp, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 11:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support per Spurzem. Somewhat tight crop, and somewhat noisy, but good enough for an A4-size print. --Smial 11:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support per Spurzem. Красный 21:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality - "sharpness" is relative to magnification and unless this building detail is blown out of proportion it appears to meet acceptable standards for QI. --Scotch Mist 06:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Low detail level and sharpness.--Peulle 08:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 13:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Photographers_in_Rabat.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Photographers at Mausoleum Mohammed V, Rabat --PetarM 13:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 19:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. The photographers are quite good but the post on the right adds nothing to the image (move to the left a little). Also, the three people in the background are too distracting, particularly the man in the middle doing something with his nose. --GRDN711 17:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support I opposed at FP but think this is perfectly fine for QI. BigDom 00:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support --AuHaidhausen 20:33, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for QI IMO. Nacaru 00:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 01:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Chapelle_Saint-Grégoire_(Marckolsheim).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Saint-Grégoire Chapel in Marckolsheim (Bas-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 19:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, too dark and tilted --Jacek Halicki 21:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Way underexposed. --Kallerna 15:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Better ? Gzen92 20:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good now, the white is bright as it should be but there is still detail there. BigDom 00:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support per BigDom. --Smial 11:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good --Plozessor 04:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough for QI now. Nacaru 00:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 01:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Malbork_Castle_2023_061.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Relief of Madonna & The Magi at the Castle of the Teutonic Order in Malbork --Scotch Mist 13:11, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment I don't think it's sharp enough. --Sebring12Hrs 15:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Another perspective? --Scotch Mist 22:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sharpness seems acceptable but perspective is not ideal. --Plozessor 04:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
    •  Comment @Plozessor: Thanks for your view - what appears to be a 'non-ideal perspective' is due to an actual mis-alignment (non-parallel) edges at the bottom of the image, as is evidenced from the photos taken by others of this relief. --Scotch Mist 09:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I can't imagine it can be promote... --Sebring12Hrs 16:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
    •  Comment @Sebring12Hrs: Perhaps viewing photos taken by others (eg File:Malbork_zamek_38.jpg) in Category:St. Anne's Chapel (Malbork Castle) may be helpful. --Scotch Mist 06:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 08:35, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Malbork_Castle_2023_112.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination River View of St Mary's Church, High Castle of the Teutonic Order in Malbork (Lightened Shadows!) --Scotch Mist 06:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • IMHO, it is better with the darker shadows. --C messier 16:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Another perspective? --Scotch Mist 13:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I agree with C messier, it kinda makes it look processed with the current shadows. Nacaru 01:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done OK, thank you both for your comments - have reverted to previous version!--Scotch Mist 06:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support. Nacaru 00:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Current version seems ok. --Plozessor 04:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom (talk) 05:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)